The Buick Envista, a twin of the Chevrolet Trax, falls short in many areas despite its recent introduction in the US market. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) found significant safety deficiencies in the 2024 model, including poor performance in updated crash tests and mixed results in crash avoidance features.
While the Envista aced some tests, it failed to meet IIHS standards for head and neck injury protection for rear passengers in side impact and moderate overlap front crashes. Additionally, its front crash prevention system earned an acceptable rating due to inconsistent performance in pedestrian and vehicle scenarios.
The Envista’s headlights were also rated marginal, and its LATCH system was considered acceptable but not exemplary. Beyond these specific shortcomings, the Envista’s safety performance raises concerns for potential buyers. Given that it is a relatively new model, one might expect a higher level of safety features and performance.
The Envista’s deficiencies highlight the importance of thorough research and evaluation before making a purchase decision. It is also worth noting that the Envista is manufactured in both South Korea and China, which may raise questions about potential differences in quality or safety standards.
While GM has a reputation for producing reliable vehicles, the Envista’s performance raises concerns about the quality control and safety measures in place at its manufacturing facilities. The Buick Envista’s safety shortcomings are a significant disappointment. While it may offer other features or benefits, its safety deficiencies should be carefully considered by potential buyers.
Given the importance of safety in a vehicle, it is advisable to explore other options that may provide a higher level of protection. The Buick Envista, a compact crossover, offers a less powerful engine and transmission combination compared to its Chinese counterpart. Despite having a 1.2 liter turbocharged engine, the Envista falls short in power and performance, especially when compared to its rivals.
Additionally, the lack of all wheel drive further limits its appeal in the US market, where AWD is highly valued, particularly for crossover vehicles. The Envista’s fuel economy, while slightly better than the Bronco Sport, is not sufficient to compensate for its other shortcomings.
When compared to its direct rivals, the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen Taos, the Envista faces significant challenges. Both the CX-30 and Taos offer more powerful four cylinder engines and the option of all wheel drive, making them more attractive to consumers. While the Envista may have a lower starting price, its package is less competitive due to its limited capabilities.
