Car manufacturers often manipulate power output figures, sometimes for marketing reasons, regulatory compliance, or even to provide customers with unexpected performance gains.
A recent case involves BMW allegedly understating the horsepower of the M4 CS, sparking curiosity about why automakers engage in this practice.
While it may seem deceptive, this can sometimes benefit consumers, as some vehicles perform better than advertised. This revelation led to an exploration of instances where cars produced more power than officially claimed, forming the basis of a compiled list.
The list excludes well-known examples like the Audi RS4 B7 and Porsche 959 but highlights other vehicles with understated horsepower figures. These discrepancies are confirmed through independent dyno tests, though real-world power outputs can vary due to factors such as altitude, fuel quality, and testing conditions.
The vehicles are ranked based on their claimed power, with actual performance often exceeding manufacturer specifications, reinforcing the idea that advertised figures don’t always tell the whole story.
1. R34 Nissan Skyline GT-R
The R34 Nissan Skyline GT-R was officially rated at 276 horsepower due to the Japanese Gentleman’s Agreement, a pact among automakers to cap power output and prevent a horsepower war.
However, this figure was misleading, as many Japanese performance cars, including the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, Subaru Impreza WRX STI, and Toyota Supra, secretly produced more power than advertised.
While the agreement aimed to promote safety and control escalating performance battles, manufacturers routinely understated their vehicles’ actual capabilities.
In reality, the R34 Skyline GT-R was significantly more powerful than its claimed output. Dyno tests indicated the RB26DETT 2.6-liter twin-turbo inline-6 engine produced between 305 and 350 horsepower, making the car even more formidable than its predecessors, the R32 and R33.
Known for its exceptional performance and thrilling engine note, the R34 cemented the “Godzilla” nickname with its legendary capabilities, proving that its true power far exceeded what Nissan officially disclosed.
2. Chevrolet “Catfish” Camaro
The fourth-generation Chevrolet “Catfish” Camaro, known for its distinctive styling, was also secretly more powerful than advertised. From 1998 onward, it was equipped with the same 5.7-liter LS1 V8 engine found in the Corvette, but Chevrolet intentionally understated its performance to avoid overshadowing its flagship sports car.
Officially, the Camaro was rated at 310 horsepower (or 325 hp in the SS variant), while the Corvette was advertised with a higher output. However, many enthusiasts and experts suspected that the Camaro’s actual power figures were much closer to the Corvette’s 350 horsepower.
This strategic downplaying of performance helped Chevrolet maintain a clear hierarchy between the Camaro and Corvette. Despite the official numbers, real-world tests and dyno results suggested that the Camaro delivered Corvette-level power, making it an even better value for muscle car fans.
This hidden performance, combined with its aggressive styling and strong aftermarket potential, has cemented the Catfish Camaro’s place as a beloved underdog in American car history.
3. Honda Civic Type R
The 2022-present Honda Civic Type R was officially rated at 315 horsepower, but dyno tests revealed an impressive 316 horsepower at the wheels, suggesting its actual crank output is closer to 340 hp.
This aligns with Honda’s tendency to under-promise and over-deliver on performance. The same 2.0-liter turbocharged inline-four engine also powers the Acura Integra Type S, which is marketed as having 320 horsepower—the most powerful Honda four-cylinder ever.
However, this raises speculation about whether the Integra’s claimed output is accurate or simply a way to justify its higher price compared to the Civic Type R.
4. 1999-2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
The 1999 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra was initially advertised with 320 horsepower from its revised 4.6-liter V8, but owners quickly discovered their cars were underperforming. Dyno tests indicated an actual output of only 285 horsepower, making it slower than the 1998 model.
This misrepresentation led to a major controversy, forcing Ford to halt sales and recall sold units. To rectify the issue, Ford replaced the intake manifold, computer components, and parts of the exhaust system, ensuring the Cobra truly delivered 320 horsepower.
However, the damage to its reputation was significant, leading Ford to take drastic action the following year.
In 2000, Ford skipped producing a regular SVT Cobra but introduced the high-performance Cobra R, equipped with a 5.4-liter V8 officially rated at 385 horsepower.
Skeptical after the previous fiasco, owners conducted dyno tests and found that the Cobra R’s power figures were actually measured at the wheels, meaning its true crankshaft output was likely over 400 horsepower.
This suggested Ford had overcompensated for its past mistake, ensuring the Cobra R exceeded expectations and restoring confidence in the Mustang SVT lineup.
5. Ford Mustang Boss 429
The 1969-1970 Ford Mustang Boss 429 was built to homologate Ford’s 429ci V8 for NASCAR competition, but instead of being placed in the Torino, it found its way into the Mustang.
Officially rated at 375 horsepower, the reality was quite different, with period reports estimating the engine produced between 475 and 500 horsepower. This powerhouse came with a 735 CFM Holley four-barrel carburetor on a high-rise intake manifold and hydraulic cams, making it one of the most potent Mustangs of its time.
Despite its impressive performance, the Boss 429 package was expensive, costing $1,200—almost the price of a new VW Beetle.
Ford, like many automakers of the muscle car era, intentionally understated the Boss 429’s power to keep insurance rates lower. However, as insurance companies caught on to these deceptive ratings, high-performance muscle cars became more expensive to own.
The Boss 429 was discontinued after 1970, ending its short-lived but legendary run, though its overpowered semi-hemi V8 remains one of the most iconic engines in Ford’s history.
6. A90 Toyota GR Supra
The A90 Toyota GR Supra, introduced in 2019, carried the legacy of its predecessor but sparked controversy due to its BMW-sourced platform and engine. However, this partnership came with an unexpected perk—BMW’s tendency to understate performance figures.
Officially rated at 382 horsepower from its 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-6, the Supra’s acceleration times raised suspicions that it was making more power than advertised.
Given the history of the Mk4 Supra’s understated output due to Japan’s Gentleman’s Agreement, enthusiasts suspected Toyota and BMW were once again downplaying the car’s true capabilities.
In 2021, Car and Driver tested the updated GR Supra’s real output on a dyno, revealing that it wasn’t just making 382 horsepower but actually producing 388 horsepower and 422 lb-ft of torque at the wheels. This suggested its true crank output was well over 400 horsepower—far exceeding Toyota’s claims.
With its aggressive styling, impressive performance, and unexpected power surplus, the A90 Supra proved to be far more potent than its official specifications suggested, reinforcing BMW’s reputation for underpromising and overdelivering on engine performance.
7. Chevrolet L88 Corvette
The 1967-1969 Chevrolet L88 Corvette was one of the most extreme versions of the Corvette ever built, yet Chevrolet barely advertised it. Unlike today, where every Corvette variant is heavily marketed, the L88 was intentionally kept under the radar.
This was because Chevrolet didn’t want casual buyers to purchase it, as the car was designed specifically for racing. Officially rated at 435 horsepower, the L88 was actually far more powerful, with real-world figures ranging from 540 to 580 horsepower, thanks to a highly modified 427-cubic-inch V8.
The mastermind behind the L88 was Zora Arkus-Duntov, the father of the Corvette and GM’s performance director, who envisioned it as a race car rather than a street machine. To ensure it reached the right hands, Chevrolet gave it a deceptively low power rating, discouraging inexperienced buyers.
As a result, only 218 units were produced before 1969, with many going straight to the racetrack, where they proved their true potential. Today, the L88 remains one of the most legendary and sought-after Corvettes ever built.
8. Ferrari F40
The 1987-1992 Ferrari F40 was a groundbreaking supercar that pushed the limits of high-performance turbocharging. Officially, Ferrari claimed it produced 478 horsepower and 425 lb-ft of torque, but many believe the real output was over 500 horsepower.
Built with lightweight carbon fiber construction and a curb weight of just 2,425 lbs, the F40 delivered an intense driving experience. Its 3.9-liter twin-turbo V8 produced power in a brutally aggressive manner, making it feel far faster than its numbers suggested.
Ferrari may have deliberately understated the F40’s power to make its sub-500-horsepower rating seem even more impressive at the time. The car’s explosive acceleration and raw, unfiltered performance made it a legend, and it set a benchmark for future supercars.
Ironically, its successor, the F50, which had a naturally aspirated V12, felt less thrilling in comparison, cementing the F40’s reputation as one of Ferrari’s most exhilarating creations.
9. C8 Corvette Stingray
The mid-engined C8 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray delivers significantly more power than its official rating of 495 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque from its 6.2-liter LT2 V8.
Independent dyno testing by MotorTrend revealed outputs of 478 horsepower and 544 lb-ft at the wheels, which translates to around 562 horsepower and 640 lb-ft at the crank when accounting for drivetrain losses. This discrepancy suggests that GM may be understating the car’s true potential.
Chevrolet, however, attributes the lower official rating to stricter Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) testing protocols, which require a slower power buildup on the dyno, causing increased heat and energy losses.
Regardless of the explanation, the extra power makes the C8 Corvette even more impressive. With a base MSRP of $68,300, a blistering 0-60 mph time of just 3.0 seconds, and a top speed of 194 mph, the Stingray delivers performance that rivals far more expensive supercars.
The mid-engine layout enhances handling and acceleration, making it a serious contender in the sports car segment. Whether intentional or not, Chevrolet’s understated power figures only add to the Corvette’s reputation as one of the best performance bargains on the market.
10. 2019 BMW M5 Competition
BMW has a long history of underrating its M models, and the 2019-2022 M5 Competition was no exception. Officially, BMW claimed the twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 produced 617 horsepower and 553 lb-ft of torque at the crank, but Car and Driver dyno tests told a different story.
The M5 Competition actually put down 617 horsepower and 606 lb-ft at the wheels, indicating that real crankshaft power was even higher. This discrepancy also translated to quicker-than-advertised acceleration, reinforcing BMW’s reputation for delivering more power than it claims.
When asked about this power discrepancy, BMW M’s Project Manager of Drivetrain, Axel Theiling, explained that BMW uses a strict testing methodology, holding peak power for at least 30 seconds rather than relying on a single-point peak from a dyno run.
He also emphasized that BMW ensures its claimed figures are achievable in real-world conditions, regardless of altitude, weather, or other factors. According to Theiling, BMW prioritizes the entire performance package over just one number, ensuring customers experience consistent and repeatable performance across all environments.
These examples highlight a long-standing trend in the automotive industry—understating power figures for strategic reasons. Whether it’s to comply with regulations, manage insurance costs, or create marketing advantages, manufacturers often publish conservative numbers that don’t fully reflect a car’s real-world capabilities.
For enthusiasts, discovering that a vehicle is actually more powerful than advertised adds to its appeal, creating a sense of exclusivity and hidden performance potential.
While some brands, like BMW and Ferrari, have a reputation for understating power, others, like Ford and Chevrolet, have occasionally done the opposite or had to revise their claims after real-world testing. Ultimately, these discrepancies serve as a reminder that raw numbers on a spec sheet don’t always tell the full story.
Real-world performance, driver experience, and independent testing often reveal the true capabilities of these high-performance machines, making them even more exciting for those who appreciate their engineering.
Also Read: 10 Best Plug-In Hybrid SUVs for Maximum Efficiency and Long-Distance Driving in 2025
