Vehicle safety plays a vital role in protecting occupants during accidents. Crash test ratings from trusted organizations like NHTSA and IIHS reveal how well vehicles withstand collisions and protect passengers. Beyond advanced safety tech, structural integrity is key to surviving crashes with minimal injury.
This overview separates five vehicles known for maintaining their structural tightness and occupant safety even after severe impacts from five others that have shown weaknesses, helping buyers make safer choices based on crashworthiness and safety technology.
5 Cars That Stay Tight Even After Accidents
1. Volvo XC90: The Safety Pioneer
The Volvo XC90 epitomizes safety in the SUV segment with consistently top crash ratings. Its high-strength steel safety cage absorbs and redirects crash forces away from the cabin. Volvo’s City Safety system, featuring automatic emergency braking and pedestrian detection, prevents or mitigates collisions.
The SUV also includes multiple airbags and advanced driver-assist technologies like lane-keeping and blind-spot monitoring. With excellent performance in frontal, side, and rollover tests, the XC90 remains a prime choice for families focused on crash protection and stability.
2. Subaru Outback: Rugged and Resilient
The Subaru Outback blends ruggedness with solid safety thanks to its reinforced steel frame and strategically placed crumple zones. It boasts Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology, including adaptive cruise control and pre-collision braking, helping prevent accidents.
The symmetrical all-wheel-drive system enhances traction and reduces rollover risks. Multiple airbags provide comprehensive occupant protection. Scoring high in frontal and side-impact tests, the Outback appeals to adventurers and families who want a reliable vehicle that stays structurally sound and safe even after a crash.
3. Audi A6: Luxury Meets Protection
Audi’s A6 combines elegant design with robust crashworthiness. It uses a mix of high-strength steel and aluminum to form a body structure that absorbs impact energy efficiently. The sedan’s advanced crumple zones reduce forces transferred to occupants in frontal and side collisions.
The A6 features a multi-stage airbag system and safety technologies such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. Consistent top crash ratings make this luxury sedan an excellent choice for drivers seeking sophisticated safety without compromising comfort or performance.
4. Tesla Model 3: Electric Safety Innovator
Tesla’s Model 3 shines not only as a leading electric vehicle but also as a safety leader. It achieves five-star NHTSA ratings and the IIHS Top Safety Pick+ status. Its rigid steel and aluminum frame, combined with a low-mounted battery pack, lowers the center of gravity, reducing rollover risk.
Tesla’s Autopilot includes automatic emergency braking and lane assist, helping avoid crashes. The Model 3’s extensive airbags and large crumple zones provide extra protection, making it a benchmark for safety in electric vehicles and a strong contender for safety-conscious buyers.
5. Honda CR-V: Compact SUV with Strong Protection
The Honda CR-V consistently earns high crash test scores due to its solid construction and advanced safety features. Its high-strength steel body and crumple zones absorb collision forces effectively. The Honda Sensing suite offers collision mitigation braking, lane-keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control to prevent accidents.
A comprehensive airbag system safeguards front and rear passengers. The CR-V’s strong performance in frontal and side impacts makes it a practical, reliable choice for families needing a safe and comfortable compact SUV.
Also Read: 5 Cars That Get Cheaper With Age and 5 That Get More Expensive
5 Cars That Fall Apart
1. Fiat 500L: Quirky but Structurally Weak
The Fiat 500L struggles with safety, earning poor crash ratings that raise serious concerns. It shows weak structural integrity in frontal crashes, particularly on the driver’s side, risking occupant injury. Side-impact performance is mediocre, and the high center of gravity increases rollover chances.
While basic airbags and stability control exist, the 500L lacks advanced driver-assistance technologies like automatic emergency braking or lane-keeping assist. These shortcomings make it a less suitable choice for those prioritizing safety over style and affordability.
2. Mitsubishi Mirage: Budget Car with Safety Deficiencies
Despite being affordable, the Mitsubishi Mirage falls short on crash protection. Its cabin structure shows significant weaknesses in frontal collisions, compromising occupant safety.
Side-impact ratings are marginal at best. Unlike many modern cars, the Mirage lacks essential advanced safety features such as automatic emergency braking and lane departure warnings.
While basic airbags and stability control are present, the overall safety performance is insufficient, making it a risky pick for buyers who prioritize crashworthiness in their vehicle choice.
3. Nissan Rogue (2015-2016): Older Models with Safety Gaps
Earlier Nissan Rogue models, particularly from 2015 to 2016, demonstrate concerning crash test results. They performed poorly in side-impact and small overlap frontal tests due to structural vulnerabilities and cabin intrusion. Rear-seat occupant protection in side collisions was inadequate.
Furthermore, these models lack modern safety technology like automatic emergency braking and lane-keeping assist. Though newer versions have improved, buyers of these older Rogues should exercise caution and consider vehicles with stronger safety reputations.
4. Chrysler 200 (2015-2017): Midsize Sedan with Safety Weaknesses
The Chrysler 200 models from 2015 to 2017 received disappointing crash test scores. The vehicle’s structure failed to protect occupants well in frontal crashes, with dashboard intrusion posing injury risks. Side-impact protection for rear passengers was also poor.
While basic airbags and stability control were included, newer safety technologies were absent. Despite its comfort and style, the Chrysler 200’s weak crashworthiness and lack of driver-assist features make it a less favorable choice for safety-conscious buyers.
5. Kia Rio (2017-2019): Affordable Yet Unsafe
The Kia Rio from 2017 to 2019 has lower-than-average crash ratings. Frontal crash tests revealed structural weaknesses and cabin intrusion, especially compromising front-seat safety. Side-impact protection was also insufficient, notably for rear passengers.
The Rio lacks advanced safety features such as automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring that are common in newer vehicles. While practical and budget-friendly, the Rio’s safety shortcomings make it a less attractive option for buyers focused on occupant protection.
When choosing a vehicle, safety should be a foremost concern as it directly impacts occupant survival and injury severity during accidents. This summary highlights the contrast between vehicles that remain structurally sound after collisions and those that fall short in crash protection.
Advanced safety technologies paired with strong crash test performance create a safer driving experience. By understanding these differences, consumers can make informed decisions that prioritize crashworthiness, protecting themselves and their loved ones on the road.
Also Read: 5 Cars With Cheap OEM Parts and 5 With Dealer-Only Nightmares
