It might not be a frequent occurrence, but every so often the UK experiences a snowfall heavy enough to make driving more difficult.
However, with the right preparation and a few helpful tips, most snowy conditions shouldn’t prevent you from reaching your destination.
We’ll offer some advice here, but if you want to be as well-prepared as possible for the yearly snowfalls, it’s worth noting that certain cars are more suitable than others. Below is a list of the most capable ones.
Although SUVs and crossover-style vehicles may appear to be designed for handling slippery roads, it’s important to remember that looks can be deceiving.
Many of these vehicles are not even equipped with all-wheel drive, meaning they’re no better in snowy weather than a standard car.
In fact, winter tyres with rubber compounds and tread patterns optimized for cold weather can make an even greater impact than all-wheel drive.
While there is an upfront cost involved (not to mention the hassle of switching wheels and needing storage for the set not in use), if snow is a regular feature where you live, the investment could be worthwhile.
Winter tyres are generally advised once temperatures fall below seven degrees, and in some parts of Europe, they are legally required when driving in snowy conditions so be sure to check before you travel.
Cars That Work in Real American Winters
Below, we’ve compiled our top recommendations for the best vehicles to drive in snowy conditions, along with some general advice for navigating the roads when winter weather strikes.
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki has a strong tradition of producing compact, budget-friendly all-wheel drive vehicles, with the Ignis being one of our top picks.
However, for this recommendation, we’re aiming a bit higher and suggesting the larger S-Cross, which offers additional space for all your winter gear think shovels, boots, and yes, even sledges!
The S-Cross lineup includes several levels of hybrid technology to help reduce fuel expenses, but it’s worth noting that most models come with front-wheel drive only.
If you live in an area where heavy snowfall is common and want the added confidence of four-wheel traction, we’d recommend opting for the mild hybrid variant in the top-tier Ultra trim.
This version comes equipped with Suzuki’s straightforwardly named ALLGRIP all-wheel drive system. While it does come at a slightly higher cost, the specification also includes other winter-friendly features such as heated seats and mirrors, along with all the comforts you’d expect.
In an era where cars are increasingly complex and packed with advanced technology, the Suzuki S-Cross presents itself as a bit of an anomaly. It offers the option of a manual gearbox, an engine lineup that remains largely similar to the previous generation, and an infotainment touchscreen that maxes out at 9.0 inches.
These features contrast starkly with what’s now typical in the segment, where rivals like the spacious Ford Puma, the bold Kia Sportage, the trendy Volkswagen T-Cross, and the futuristic Peugeot 3008 are loaded with technology—often more than most drivers will ever need.
There’s no doubt the S-Cross is nearing the end of its current production cycle and will soon be replaced by an electric successor, the eVX. That said, its focus on simplicity raises the question: does this retro approach leave it lagging in today’s market? Let’s find out.
The S-Cross range begins with the mild-hybrid Motion model. This version comes equipped with adaptive cruise control, a 7.0-inch touchscreen featuring Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and heated seats.
It’s powered by a 1.4-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine coupled with a 48V integrated starter-generator (ISG). For a modest price increase, you can upgrade to the full-hybrid variant, which pairs a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine with a 140V battery and a six-speed automated manual transmission.
The range-topping Ultra model includes additional features such as four-wheel drive, a 9.0-inch touchscreen, a 360-degree parking camera, built-in satellite navigation, and a panoramic sunroof. All S-Cross models come with 17-inch alloy wheels.
When tested, the S-Cross earned a 6 out of 10 rating. While it lacks competitiveness in some key areas, it still serves its existing customer base reliably. It provides solid space, decent performance, and strong fuel economy for the money.
It also delivers an uncluttered and simplified driving experience, and the engines are notably efficient. However, the interior materials feel cheap and outdated, road noise is intrusive, and the overall driving dynamics leave room for improvement.
From a design standpoint, even the base trim includes all the necessary equipment, and it remains one of the few cars in its price range to offer four-wheel drive. On the flip side, some buyers may find the exterior styling to be bland and forgettable.
Still, the current S-Cross generation appears much more confident than its predecessors, with a squared-off front and bold LED headlights. The rear features a modern light bar, and Suzuki has also reshaped the rear quarter windows to update the overall silhouette. While the exterior has received a comprehensive redesign, the same cannot be said for the cabin.
Under the surface, all S-Cross models are electrified. The mild-hybrid variant uses a 48V system, which allows the ISG to add meaningful torque during initial acceleration—unlike the simpler 12V systems in models like the Nissan Qashqai.
This version produces 127bhp and 173lb ft of torque, with the ISG contributing up to 13bhp and 39lb ft. Notably, this boost is delivered at low revs, enhancing responsiveness while the engine builds power.
This setup results in a top speed of 121mph and a 0–62mph time of 9.5 seconds. The full-hybrid version produces 116bhp and 101lb ft, reaching a top speed of 108mph with a slower 0–62mph time of 12.7 seconds. The mild-hybrid is available with a six-speed manual gearbox, while the full-hybrid uses a six-speed automated manual.
Suzuki is somewhat unconventional in that nearly all its models, excluding the rebadged Toyota Corolla Touring Sports-based Swace, offer four-wheel drive. Even compact models like the Swift and Ignis can be equipped with it. In larger vehicles like the S-Cross, four-wheel drive is more typical, but it’s rarely seen in base models at this price point.
Inside, the S-Cross offers a reasonably spacious cabin and a driving position with good adjustability. The driver assistance features are also simple to disable. However, the infotainment system is particularly basic, and the cabin materials feel cheap. Though the exterior has been updated, the interior largely mirrors the layout from the 2013 model.
Apart from a newer infotainment screen and some added rubberised trim on the dash, the design hasn’t evolved significantly. When it debuted, the interior was described as “cheap and cheerful but convenient and credible too.”
Today, only part of that assessment holds up. It still feels cheap and convenient, but the cheerfulness is gone. That level of austerity may have once been standard outside of premium brands, but today even value-focused manufacturers like Dacia demonstrate that it’s possible to add visual interest and quality materials without sacrificing affordability.
The S-Cross’s cabin is visually dull, but its ergonomics are solid. The seats provide adequate support, and the high seating position—paired with a well-adjustable steering column and driver’s seat—should accommodate most drivers comfortably. While there’s no lumbar support adjustment, this wasn’t an issue for most testers, even on longer journeys.
In the back, adult passengers will find slightly more legroom than in the Qashqai. However, headroom becomes tight when equipped with the panoramic sunroof that’s standard on Ultra trim. Although the rear seatbacks are adjustable, the change is minimal and barely noticeable.
The rear passenger area also lacks features—it doesn’t offer air vents or USB ports, which is a significant omission for a family-oriented vehicle. The boot is adequate but unremarkable. It’s smaller than the Qashqai’s and, apart from a movable floor and a 12V socket, lacks added functionality such as cargo hooks or dividers.
On the road, the lane-keeping assist doesn’t perform well on rural roads with faint markings, although it isn’t overly intrusive. On motorways, however, it keeps the vehicle centred effectively. Adaptive cruise control performs decently too. If these features don’t suit your preferences, they can be quickly disabled using physical buttons located around the steering wheel.
Suzuki has developed a new infotainment system for this generation of S-Cross, but it’s still far from exceptional. It lacks rich features, quick responsiveness, and graphical finesse.
That said, the core functions are logically arranged, and the built-in navigation system is better than what some far more expensive vehicles offer, providing clear directions and easy route alterations.
Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, as expected. However, the absence of a wireless phone charger is frustrating, and even the available wired charging options are limited—only a single USB-A port and one 12V socket are present in the cabin.
Dacia Duster
A popular choice in ski resorts and other areas where demanding road conditions are the norm, the Dacia Duster’s blend of affordability, durability, and practical, no-frills features such as tough rubber floor mats makes it an ideal vehicle for winter travel.
The latest version of the Duster has evolved and taken on more of an SUV appearance, but it remains faithful to its original concept.
Smart design choices, like the use of unpainted and partially recycled plastics on the exterior, add to its rugged, hard-wearing reputation.
Although the standard model and the new hybrid version come with front-wheel drive only, there is still an all-wheel drive variant available.
This version is paired with the reliable 1.2-litre TCe 130 petrol engine and also benefits from increased ground clearance and a special snow driving mode among its added features.
With this setup and a wide array of accessories designed for outdoor use, the Duster stands out as an excellent, budget-friendly option for tough winter conditions.
Toyota bZ4X/Subaru Solterra
Although cold weather can place extra demands on electric car batteries and may lead to a slight reduction in driving range, there’s no reason to leave your EV parked just because there’s snow on the road.
That said, not all electric vehicles perform the same in winter conditions some models can deliver power a little too abruptly, which can be tricky to manage on slippery surfaces.
That’s where the Toyota bZ4X comes in. It was designed from the outset with greater emphasis on off-road capability than most electric SUVs.
The twin-motor versions provide power to all four wheels, and Toyota’s smooth power delivery system ensures optimal grip without any excessive wheelspin.
The same applies to the Subaru Solterra, which is essentially a rebadged version of the same vehicle.
This might not sound like a major difference at first glance until you consider Subaru’s long-standing reputation for building reliable four-wheel drive vehicles.
This has earned the brand loyal fans from America’s snow belt to the remote regions of Scotland.
While the badge may be the only visible difference between the two models, the Subaru emblem carries a legacy of trusted all-weather performance.
Land Rover Defender Hard Top
If you’re in need of a commercial vehicle that can handle winter conditions, the Land Rover Defender Hard Top is an excellent option. At its core, it’s a Defender adapted for commercial use by removing the rear seats, effectively turning it into a van.
It’s a genuine off-roader and is offered in both the three-door 90 and the five-door 110 configurations. The 90 version resembles a traditional commercial vehicle more closely, thanks to its panelled rear windows.
However, it offers less cargo capacity 1,355 litres compared to the 110 model’s more spacious 2,059 litres.
Regardless of the version, the Hard Top benefits from the same underpinnings as the standard Defender, meaning it delivers the kind of ride quality you’d expect from a luxury vehicle.
It also performs exceptionally well in snowy conditions, particularly the 90 model, whose shorter wheelbase provides a greater sense of agility and control. A generous amount of safety equipment comes as standard.
Skoda Kodiaq
The newest version of the Skoda Kodiaq may have taken a noticeable step up in terms of design and premium features, but at its core, it remains just as robust, roomy, practical, and well-suited to winter conditions as ever.
While fuel-efficient front-wheel drive and plug-in hybrid variants are available, there’s also the option of a winter-ready 4×4 model if you choose the diesel engine.
Admittedly, this version will cost more to buy and maintain, but if you’re looking for a seven-seat SUV that can handle snow-covered school runs, there are few better options.
An optional Winter Package enhances its cold-weather credentials even further, offering heated seats in both the front and rear, along with a heated steering wheel.
If you’re already investing in winter comfort, we’d also recommend going for the optional heated windscreen to ensure visibility in all weather conditions.
And for those unexpected moments, there’s still the trusty ice scraper neatly stored in the fuel filler cap ready when you need it.
Unreliable Winter Cars
While winter’s freezing temperatures can put a damper on many aspects of the season, the enjoyment of driving doesn’t have to come to a halt just because the weather turns cold.
In fact, with the right vehicle, you can remain safe on the roads while still enjoying everything winter has to offer whether it’s heading up to the mountains for a ski trip, visiting friends at a cozy winter cabin, or simply making a quick run to your local shopping centre.
That said, while many new and used vehicles from manufacturers like Toyota, Ford, Honda, and Jeep are well-equipped to handle winter driving conditions, not all cars are built the same.
Some may lack the horsepower necessary to push through snow, while others might not be equipped with four-wheel drive (4WD) or all-wheel drive (AWD) systems essential for dealing with harsh weather or off-road conditions.
These shortcomings can render certain vehicles better off parked in the garage until the warmer months return.
As good as some cars may be on the road, this doesn’t mean they are good on the road in winter. Here are some vehicles to avoid driving when the ground is covered in snow and ice:
Audi Q7
This SUV ranks among the lowest in its class when it comes to traction performance, making it challenging to navigate snowy roads.
In addition to that, the vehicle is hindered by underwhelming acceleration, and its high center of gravity increases the risk of sliding in slippery conditions.
Even with all-wheel drive (AWD) engaged, the system struggles to adequately manage the vehicle’s weight, often resulting in a tendency to spin out despite the traction mode being activated.
The 2025 Audi Q7 continues to offer much of what has made it a solid option in the midsize luxury SUV market. It stands out for its exceptional interior materials and build quality, its wide array of standard and available technology features, and its well-balanced ride and handling characteristics.
At the same time, it falls short in a few key areas: its third-row seat is cramped, cargo capacity lags behind some competitors, and its infotainment system can be distracting to use.
For 2025, the Q7 gets some light but effective updates. The styling has been refreshed at both the front and rear, and Audi now offers new wheel designs and next-generation digital OLED lighting. Buyers can also choose from a range of new exterior paint colors and interior trim options, adding visual distinction to the model.
These changes enhance the Q7’s overall appeal without altering its core identity. Still, it’s worth noting that the SUV remains part of the second generation first introduced in 2017, and the updates don’t resolve ongoing issues with cargo space or third-row comfort.
The infotainment system receives the most notable upgrade this year. Through the Audi App Store, drivers can now download widely used apps such as Spotify and YouTube directly onto the system.
Audi has also extended its complimentary trial periods for a number of connected services, including in-car Wi-Fi, online navigation, and its unique Traffic Light Information system—features that help modernize the vehicle’s tech offering.
In terms of cost to drive, estimates for the 2025 Audi Q7 Premium 4dr SUV AWD with the 45 TFSI powertrain (a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with a mild hybrid system) are based on 15,000 miles per year of driving.
These estimates assume a fuel cost of $3.93 per gallon for premium unleaded in North Dakota and a driving split of 55% city and 45% highway. Under these assumptions, the Q7 Premium comes in at approximately $216 per month, compared to an average of $227 per month for large SUVs.
Though the Q7 may not attract the same level of attention as some of its flashier rivals, it remains a compelling option for buyers seeking a refined, well-rounded luxury SUV. With its quiet confidence, impressive tech, and Audi’s characteristically clean design, it delivers a driving experience that’s as satisfying as it is understated.
BMW 1, 3, 5, & 7 Series
While BMW is renowned for producing some truly iconic vehicles, the brand isn’t particularly celebrated for its reliability especially when it comes to handling snowy conditions.
A key issue lies in how low these cars sit to the ground. This minimal clearance causes them to sink into snow and ice, making acceleration more difficult.
Some models have as little as four inches of ground clearance, which significantly limits their ability to move through deeper snow.
Additionally, many newer BMW models come equipped with rear-wheel drive (RWD), which is far from ideal in winter weather.
That said, certain BMW models particularly SUVs do offer all-wheel drive (AWD) systems, which can be helpful when driving in snowy conditions.
Just be sure to pair them with a good set of snow tires for optimal performance.
2007 Dodge Nitro
The 2007 Dodge Nitro is another vehicle that proves unreliable for winter driving, largely due to multiple braking and steering problems, as well as several safety recalls.
One of the most serious concerns involves a recall related to the failure of its anti-lock braking system (ABS), which significantly increases the risk of an unexpected crash.
In addition to this major issue, the Nitro also had a tendency to roll over during sharp turns an especially dangerous flaw when navigating icy or slippery roads.
In a segment where four-cylinder engines are the standard and V6 upgrades typically come at a premium, the Dodge Nitro sets itself apart by offering two V6 engine options and multiple drivetrain configurations.
The base engine—a 3.7-liter V6 featured in the SXT and SLT trims—is described as “adequate, if uninspiring.” Although it has a larger displacement, its 210 horsepower output is nearly identical to what many smaller engines in compact SUVs produce.
It “feels raspy at anything over 3500 rpm” and delivers acceleration that is considered merely “adequate.” The SXT pairs this engine with a basic six-speed manual transmission, while the SLT uses a four-speed automatic, which is also optional on the SXT. The automatic transmission received criticism, being referred to as “rough and clumsy.”
The R/T trim is powered by a 4.0-liter V6 producing 260 horsepower, a configuration that was generally better received. “Only when equipped with the 4.0-liter engine does the 2007 Dodge Nitro feel truly quick.”
Performance numbers support this claim: “Our tester hit 60 mph in 7.7 seconds — quicker than the last Mazda CX-7 we tested, but not quite as quick as Toyota’s RAV4. The same result held true through the quarter-mile, with the Nitro breaking the traps in 15.9 seconds at 86 mph. The CX-7 was 0.3 second slower, while the RAV4 was 0.7 second quicker.”
This engine is matched with a five-speed automatic transmission that includes manual shifting capability, which was preferred over other available transmissions. It was noted that “the 4.0-liter’s five-speed manu-matic shifts nicely.”
Fuel economy, however, is not a strong suit for the Nitro. The 3.7-liter engine receives Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 16 miles per gallon in the city and 22 mpg on the highway. The 4.0-liter engine fares slightly worse, delivering 16 mpg city and 21 mpg highway—figures that are underwhelming for this class of vehicle.
The Nitro’s handling and braking leave room for improvement. Reviewers found its steering to be slow and unresponsive, and the suspension struggled to deliver a smooth ride over uneven surfaces. “Steering feel, especially with the available twenty-inch chrome wheels, grows awfully numb at speed,” with some calling it “vague” or simply “numb.”
One assessment pointed out, “The rack-and-pinion power steering system provides too much assist for my taste when traveling at highway speeds,” and it was also noted that “handling around corners is unimpressive for a small SUV, as even the sporty R/T model exhibits slow steering and significant body roll.”
Still, one upside is that “the compact exterior dimensions of the Nitro — it’s shorter than a Chevrolet Cobalt sedan — makes this SUV relatively easy to park.”
SXT models are fitted with 16-inch tires and a performance-tuned suspension, while SLT models add 17-inch tires to the same suspension setup. This configuration was not well received. “Soft suspension damping allows too much body motion over bumps.” The R/T version, which includes a sport-tuned suspension and larger tires, didn’t fare much better in evaluations.
“Its big, 20-inch diameter wheels did nothing to soften the bumps of travel along less-than-perfect roads, and they did even less to help correct the Nitro R/T’s sway-to-left-sway-to-right handling. Ditto the SUV’s sports suspension, which seemed to take a timeout on streets and highways with imperfect surfaces.”
The Nitro is offered with both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive. A part-time four-wheel-drive system comes standard on 4×4 models with manual transmissions, while a full-time system is included on 4×4 models with automatic transmissions.
“The part-time system should only be engaged when driving on slippery surfaces (RWD is used under normal driving conditions), but the full-time system includes a center differential and operates without driver intervention.”
Though the standard anti-lock brakes performed effectively during testing, the feel of the brake pedal drew criticism. “The brakes stop the Nitro without incident and are fairly linear, but the pedal itself has an uninspiring, spongy feel.”
This sentiment was echoed in other reviews: “The brake pedal has a long travel and a somewhat vague feel (typical of a trucklike vehicle), but stopping distances are convincingly short — that same Nitro R/T tester stopped in 122 feet from 60 mph.”
Porsche 911
It may come as no surprise to many that the Porsche 911 is included on this list.
Although it is one of the most iconic vehicles worldwide, the Porsche 911 is not ideally suited for driving in snowy conditions due to its high-performance rear tires, its distinctive rear-engine layout, and its low center of gravity.
However, some owners do equip their 911 with winter snow tires mounted on dedicated rims, allowing them to manage quite well in the snow.
Additionally, there are all-wheel drive versions of the 911 available, but even then, those living in areas with frequent snowfall might still want to steer clear of this model for winter driving.
Jaguar F-Type
This luxury vehicle faces challenges with braking on slippery surfaces even when equipped with $12,000 carbon-ceramic brakes.
While the slick driving traction mode can be beneficial, its effectiveness largely depends on whether the car is fitted with a good set of snow tires.
In fact, many Jaguar F-Type owners have noted a significant improvement in the vehicle’s handling on snow, ice, and other winter conditions when using snow tires.
Beneath the stylish bonnet of the Jaguar F-Type lies an impressive selection of powerful engines. Even the entry-level model is no slouch, featuring a 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine capable of reaching a top speed of 155mph.
For those seeking more excitement, the 335bhp supercharged V6 delivers a 0–62mph time of 5.1 seconds. While some versions of this V6 come with a manual gearbox, it’s worth noting that the manual shift feels a bit underwhelming—making the smooth and responsive automatic transmission the smarter choice.
Stepping up to the V6 S brings even more punch, with 375bhp and a quicker 0–62mph sprint of 4.8 seconds. This variant also includes adaptive dampers, offering a ride that, while still on the firm side, is noticeably more refined.
At the top of the range sits the F-Type R, featuring a mighty 542bhp V8 engine that catapults the car from 0–62mph in just 4.0 seconds—firmly placing it in supercar territory.
With that added power, the F-Type R also benefits from a more advanced vehicle dynamics system and stiffer suspension to ensure the power is effectively managed, along with upgraded carbon-ceramic brakes.
These enhancements are not just for show—the rear-wheel-drive V8 is a wild and highly responsive machine. In fact, the V8’s behavior prompted Jaguar to introduce all-wheel drive as standard on this variant from 2015, and as an option for the V6 S.
For those still craving more from their F-Type, Jaguar introduced the SVR in early 2016. With 567bhp under the hood, the SVR isn’t just louder and quicker—it also marked a milestone, becoming the first Jaguar since the legendary XJ220 to surpass a 200mph top speed.
